30/11/1997:
Disordered Thoughts
an appendix to Memory: A Proven Fact
Since the special self-sensing
ability responsible for voluntary movements is these neurons'
miracle property of nature, there is definitely an element of natural
incapacity ( inability
to perform without adequate training) and randomness (self-sensing
can become or remain a random process where the brain sites self-selected
could not truly be precisely or exactly located according to one's
wishes) to this inherent neuronal magic. However, usually an organism
can behave in a wilful manner, i.e. one can move the finger as
one wished, lift the leg one wants to lift . . . . This is due
to the very fact that anatomically the cortical sensorineurons
innervating one part of the body( e.g., toes of the left leg)
are closely linked to the cortical motoneurons for the same part
of the body. As a result, it is conducive for sensations from
or thoughts for one part [ of the body] to instantly activate
that same bodily part: sensing one's own fingers being burned
and instantly withdrawing them from fire is an extreme example
of how one first senses one's own bodily part and from
that sensation( and therefore from those cortical or central ganglionic
sensorineurons receiving afferent impulses, i.e., sensing this
sensation, from the peripheral pain and temperature receptors
innervating that bodily part, here, the fingers
) issues commands ( in the form of nerve impulse inputs) into
the cortical motoneurons[ for that same bodily part] to activate
the muscles responsible for moving that part of the body,#FNT0 here, for
withdrawing the fingers from fire.
In practice, this degree of selectivity is less well achieved
in thought formation. Reasons for this discrepancy include these:
1)the brain has much greater numbers of neurons allocated for
or available to modulate one single part of the body than there
are available to one single thought or word, or syllable whereas
there is almost an infinite number of words or thoughts retained
and operating in a finite number of brain sensorineurons, the
limited numbers of muscles for various bodily parts allow for
a measurable brain volume
of cortical neurons to subserve each voluntary muscle;
2)hence, while it's exceedingly difficult for one single neuron
to locate and select one single word or sentence( contained within
itself) in formulating thoughts, it is far easier for one whole
section of the cortical area to be located and selected for a
specific muscle contraction; this is why only those with gross
brain damages( i.e. , lots of neurons damaged) such as those with
strokes would have voluntary movement difficulties, but those
free from gross brain damages can still suffer from thought disorders;
3) because memories of one or several alphabets or words could
be retained in one single or few neurons, often they would be
difficult to locate and activate and therefore could be easily
forgotten while formulating thoughts( i.e. while trying
to retrieve the right memories at the right moment of time for
these memories to become an integral component of a thought ) or even during exhaustive search
for them;
4) in contrast, since one specific area of the cortex containing
millions of neurons are devoted to controlling one single bodily
part such as a finger, the cumulative aggregate sensation for
that part of the body would be comparatively(as compared to sensation
for one specific word, or thought) intense or enormous; self-sensing
and selecting that part would be relatively easy and actuating
a muscle contraction by activating that brain part would be rather
easy and more powerful than what few neurons for one single word
could do; thus, an amnesiac not even knowing his own name always
still can walk, talk, and perform all sorts of neuromusculoskeletal
activities.
In nature, those having overcome the natural incapacity and randomness
alluded to in the above became better thinking organisms for surviving
a harsh environment. Snakes knowing when and how to hide would
not be eaten by crocodiles, and man thinking better than others
may elude conquest [by others]. This is why by this process of
"the fittest survives" those remaining have carried
this so-called natural trait for their brains to be able to think
in a "sane" or logical or rational manner. Even the
lower animals think in a logical fashion. So, when a mouse has
seen me kill(murder) its mother, it would flee the moment it sees
me. Similar to our ability to learn voluntary movements, we can
selectively self-sense, activate and incorporate the right words
into a thought or thoughts. This ability initially at the beginning
of human and animal existence was rather limited. Some organisms
"invented" a way of communication, walking, eating,
hunting, etc. Then, others learned from them. By this learning
process, over centuries all human and animal advantageous(to survival,
etc.) thoughts or methods, or ways of thinking were taken in[
by the individuals] to further train the brain sensorineurons
into thinking in a rational fashion. Thus, animals and humans
alike can in this way think better and better, using the cumulative
thoughts to further extend,improve and refine brain sensorineurons'
natural ability to self-sense memories( which the thoughts also
are) and selectively incorporate them into new( such as discovering
or synthesizing new ideas) or old thoughts( such as in recalling
a proverb).
1/12/1997:
Of course, recalling is usually easier than creating new thoughts.
That is because memorization involves a neurofacilitation(e.g.,
post-tetanic potentiation, long-term potentiation, increasing
cortical representation for the bodily parts being more frequently
used
#FNT1,
#FNT2 and
therefore the more the memory-containing neurons are repeatedly
used as in rehearsing , the more neural extension these neurons
can generate to make self-sensing and activating them so much
easier than before rehearsals, etc.) process whereby the related
neural pathways and neuronal sites are continuously activated
in a time-sequence specific manner. Hence, in recalling such memorized
information( such as a sentence), these same train of neurons
can be readily reactivated in an orderly manner for recalling(
i.e. re-sensing) the information so stored in these same sensorineurons.
However, creating new thoughts requires a grater degree of regulation
over otherwise random memory pieces whose assemblage results in
new sentences or thoughts. This is where some people with thought
disorders suffer most.
These people such as some schizophrenics hereditarily lack or
somehow have lost that natural neuronal ability to correctly sense
and select the right memory pieces for incorporation into their
thoughts, thus manifesting in thought blocks, poverty of ideas;
thoughts made up of unrelated, irrelevant information( i.e. memory
pieces without content relevance to the ideas being expressed);
bizarre, irrational, or illogical thoughts, or even perceptual
defects due to their inability to correctly interpret reality(
which is the sensory perception of events outside)since their
thought processes are disorganized, defective, and interpreting
anything involves the formation of a series of thoughts, their
interpretation of even the commonest events can turn out to be
incomprehensible to a reasonable person. Their symptoms actually
illustrate the underlying processes for thought formation: the
random re-sensing and selection of relevant or correct memory
pieces for incorporation into sentences or thoughts. And, because
this is the process of thought formation, those
having difficulty in achieving perfection in formation of logical
or content-relevant thoughts would have shown their ideas being
a random assemblage of often irrelevant memory pieces, a mechanism
shared by but more perfect in others.
As explained and shown, thought formation is indeed similar to
but more sophisticated and more difficult than the process of
sensing and selecting the desired central motoneurons for firing
to achieve orderly voluntary movements. Both represent what best,
though not necessarily normally( i.e., since random thought formation
is a natural process so occurring in the sensing and self-sensing
neurons, the failure for them to synthesize logical thoughts is
not necessarily abnormal but, from that perspective of nature,
can be quite a normal and yet less-than-perfect natural process.),
can be achieved through self efforts by organisms' repeated potentiation
of these natural neuronal abilities. Once more, even thought formation
by these random, and later [ through learning and practice] more
and more well organized orderly, re-sensing and selection of the
various memory pieces depends on, and, can be and is achieved
only through the self ability to sense and later
even selectively re-sense and select the stored eMs(memory particles)
because the sensory and therefore memory neurons can sense only
eMs transmitted into them in special nerve impulses or brain wave-frequency
electromagnetic forces.
Cheng
Research Institutes:Vol 1R, direct electronic
input into the brain
Incredible as it may seem,
the impossible has been proven! (30/11/97)
"The walking
academy"
If you need internet neuroscience resources, e.g. neuroanatomy; after finishing this site, go to Neuroscience Web Search (10/ 1 /1998)
0. KC
Cheng, The Electromagnetism of Memory, Mentation and Behaviour,
volumes 13- 19.
1. WF Ganong, Review of Medical Physiology, 17th
ed., (Norwal, Conn.), 1995, pp 246, 249.
2. KC Cheng, The Electromagnetism of Memory, Mentation,
and Behaviour, volumes 6-19.