15/11/97:
Why Darwin Refuted?
The reasons are not
personal, e.g. religious beliefs or pride in being not a descendant
of the "animals." Instead, scientific evidence and thinking
have made Darwin's Theory of Evolution something which in terms
of my knowledge today, would never have seen the light of the
day: because it is not scientific and factual enough to be published
as a proven or provable scientific doctrine.
Of course, human knowledge has been progressing at a tremendous
pace since Darwin's days. Old thinking has been constantly replaced
by new, and often better ones. In Darwin's case, his theory was
t the beginning greeted with ridicule, indicating that he was
unable with his hypothesis to convince the public enough to accept
it. Unfortunately, subsequent scholars, for want of a better theory
or being unable to overthrow his "thinking," began to
with it blindly brainwash the public as if it had been proven
true. The fact of the matter
is, however, that his theory was never scientifically proven to
be a real-life biological mechanism for the creation of the various
species on earth. Even
today, no biologist could honestly prove its truth. Instead, all
they have been characteristically doing is reciting Darwin's conclusions
as truth requiring no proof or further proof. It is like
accepting Sigmund Freud's thinking. No challenges to their imaginations.
Take it serious and read
on.
Continue:Cheng Review I:1 Home I:2 Home,
This is another potent illustration
of self-publishing by
obviously very competent individuals is much better than publishing
by presses whose editors themselves are really out there to make
a buck, or incapable of truly understanding new theories. While
there is that air of respectability in such other-publishing cases,
there is not that essential quality of academic competence to
determine whether a theory is valid, scientific or great. Once
such publications go into the circulation, they may become blindly
accepted by those insufficiently discriminative or competent to
reject their fallacies or defects.
What you are reading now may be some of the most competent, best
thoughts, discoveries ever created by mankind. You can read, think
and thus judge. Am I right or was Darwin right? I'll present sufficient
evidence and arguments for you to pass a competent judgment.
Biogenesis: evolution impossible; origin
of species
Philosophy
Site Home