21/11/97:
The direct causal relationship
between the evoking flickering white light and the cortical electrical
voltage confirms several of the most vital facts of memory formation
already established by other means in my earlier writings:
1) the photons from the stimulating pulsing light actually do
enter into the [brain] visual cortical neurons, making the visual
cortex the primary site of visual memory storage(and therefore
the auditory cortex the primary site of auditory memory storage,
etc.(7), something predicted much earlier(17) and being further
traced in Memory and Colour Vision (this issue): this is
why when the white soft evoking lights are at the rate of 13.25
hertz, the visual cortical neurons gave off "quick bursts
of electricity with exactly the same frequency;" when the
stimulus is no more than light itself, the resulting increases
in visual cortical neuron discharges can be attributed only to
the photonic energy input into the visual pathways without the
light energy input, there would never have been this type of corresponding
rises in visual cortical neuron discharge of electrical bursts;
if and when the latter had exactly the same frequency( of
pulse, i.e. on and off, not in any way altering the frequency
of the light corpuscles themselves; hence, a green light remains
green despite its pulse rate or any change in its pulse rate;
the same with brainwaves: though they might show a pulse rate
the same as that of the external stimulating white light, they
still remain electromagnetic waves in the range of brainwave frequencies
or wavelengths) as the stimulating white light, evidently the
source light can effectively determine the frequency of neuronal
electrical discharge and therefore the incident light can be effectively
input in a rather direct manner into the central sensorineurons(Fig.
5, this issue):
2) the brain is a living organ taking in, storing and emitting
eMs;
3) therefore, when the afferent eMs representing stimuli to the
sensory nervous system (e.g. sound, light, etc.) can be and are
normally being sensed by central sensorineurons into which they
enter (Fig.7), only when these eMs are retained inside the brain
sensorineurons either in their original selves or in their mirror
copies can an organism or person have a memory of what has been
just sensed; hence, it is now self-evident that eMs remain
in the brain cells as memory particles for retrieval, re-sensing(i.e.
recalling) and thought(including decision ) formation and
command issuing(issuing commands to direct wilful behaviour),
and also for telepathic communication;
4) there is a total consistency in and between the material(i.e.
physical or chemical) and functional aspects of memory input,
retention, reuse and output: eM input sensed by the neurons, eMs
retained in the sensing central neurons for recollection, thought
formation and directing wilful locomotion; there has been no and can be no other material substance
entering into the central sensorineurons to be so sensable and
retainable as memory;
5) therefore, memory can be no other than the specific eMs representing
or arising from the sensation-causing and hence, memory-causing
source stimuli ( i.e. only those having being sensed
can be remembered, and sensing in itself is instantaneous remembering
or instantaneous memory(14);
6) that being the case, when eMs must be able to and do escape
from the brain cells as well as evidenced by the continuous emission
of brainwaves from living brains, telepathy becomes something
to be recognized and accepted as an unavoidable natural phenomenon,
not something mysterious or without scientific foundation; and,
when telepathy does occur, it means memory pieces can only be
eMs or could not be carried in the brainwaves for transmission
into others' brains; because photonic input increases brain neuron
emission as scalp microelectricity, the eMs channelled into and
sensed by the central sensorineurons can be partly retained in
and partly emitted by these central sensorineurons(memorineurons)---
in fact, the direct relationship between light input and visual
cortical scalp electrical discharge quoted above reflects the
quantitative relationship of "when strong enough, the more
eM input, the more loss through the scalp," so that only
a sufficient quantity is retained, if any at all, inside the brain
neurons as memory traces;
7) the re-emitted eMs contained in the scalp electricity, however,
is in a processed form, carried in brainwave electromagnetic forces,
not in the original simple visible light form( that is why, while
the external stimulating white light is visible, the eMs in the
visual cortical brainwaves over the scalp are invisible to the
naked eyes); though invisible[to
the naked eyes], these eMs contained in the brainwave electromagnetic
waves when strong enough can be received and sensed by other brains
in the same way one senses one's own thoughts: the scientific
basis of telepathy.
22/11/97:
Additional mechanisms and
principles of brain operations were illustrated by other laboratory
observations. In one case of mind control over a lamp, two electrodes
on the skull were linked to an amplifier and transmitter
for the brainwaves to control the switch. When relaxed with eyes
closed, scientist LK raised his brainwave voltage from 0.9 to
3.5 mV, thus turning on a lamp across the room. On his opening
the eyes, his brainwave voltage dropped and the light was switched
off. It was found that there were such electric device-controlling
brain signals, whose control could be facilitated by physical
movements, which 95% of the people could naturally regulate
without training.
#FNT0 This
kind of mind self-control therefore is identical in mechanism
to T's success in suppressing or raising his visual cortical brainwave
response to the stimulating white light cited above. There, the
experimenter JS said respecting how T can suppress or intensify
the voltage of a specific electrical frequency in his brain, "
No one really knows. . .. Just as with any learned response, the
exact mechanism is difficult to put into words. . . the more successfully
they control the simulator, the less able they are to explain
how they do it."19
Since brainwaves, like all electromagnetic forces can be so
amplified, boosting a person's brainwaves can enable that person's
brainwaves to effectively stimulate other people's brains in the
same way one's own thoughts which are also l in the electromagnetic
form, stimulate one's own sensorineurons. Just like one's ability
to sense one's own thoughts, sufficiently strong brainwaves from
another cause the recipients to detect and "read" the
other person's thoughts. This scientific mechanism makes electronic
telepathy a natural or
unavoidable phenomenon: If someone's brainwaves are being boosted
and broadcast, it is only normal, inescapable for others having
a brain inside their skull to detect and read that person's ongoing
mental activities such as thinking, sensing, etc. Clearly, contrary
to some misconception of ignorance, electronic telepathy is
not something occurring mysteriously, but rather scientifically:
where there are live brains and electricity, there can easily
be electronic
telepathy.
The other observation, a person's natural ability to select, selectively,
suppress or enhance one's own specific or particular components
of brainwaves to activate electric devices goes to the very heart
of learning and exercising wilful behaviour.
As we all know and alluded to in my earlier work,16 unless as all animals and humans
we do selectively activate various components of the central motoneural
network(such as the motor and pre-motor cortices in man), there
can be no voluntary or organized locomotion; only bizarre, meaningless,
disorganized movements would be possible. But since we all normally
can achieve voluntary and typically premeditated movements, we
all normally can selectively activate different and various parts
of our central motor system in a timed and time-specific manner.
This skill is improved and consolidated through practise: "Practise
makes perfect," indicating and consistent with the long known
neural facilitation: the more a neural pathway is used, the greater
the numbers of neural connections and extensions that path acquires.
In addition, practise recruits more and more neurons into accomplishing
that same task, making it easier and easier to selectively activate
that larger and larger sensory ( to activate and direct the responsible
central motor neurons for this task) and motor neuron pool. On
the other hand, once parts of these vital brain centres are damaged
by say, strokes, tumours, trauma, etc., the victims suffer from
impairment in voluntary movements, once more confirming the neurological
fact that wilful locomotions are regulated by the self's correct
selective activation of the various central sensory and motor
areas and their related pathways.
And, since in the "mind controlling electric devices"
experiments 95% of the normal could naturally selectively control
their specific brain electrical activities, they actually demonstrated
man's and other animals'
natural ability to select
specific brain areas for activation to the desired levels.
Being able to do so means being able to select which parts of
the central (usually cortical, sometimes ganglionic) motor neuronal
pools to be activated and enhanced, and which parts to be suppressed,
at any given moment in time.
In this way, an animal or a person would be able to decide what
to do and accordingly select the right brain parts for temporally
proper sequential activation or deactivation, resulting in planned
and organized skillful movements. Even animals can do so. Otherwise,
all dogs would be rabid, and all cats attacking their masters.
This is where the electromagnetism
of memory again comes into play. Only when memory is eMs retainable
and retained by the central sensorineurons has it been possible for learning to occur. From visual,
auditory, and other relevant sensory inputs, an organism comes
to learn about the external environment, e.g. cats learning to
love their masters. Because eMs at the time of input into the
brain sensory neurons are being so sensed, their continued existence
in these sensorineurons allows for their re-sensing which paves
the way for thought formation an organism's sensing one's own
memory pieces formed into trains of thought. Once thoughts are
formed, decisions can be made: decisions are merely thoughts formed
respecting relevant information which is thoughts or memories
themselves. In other words,
the electromagnetic nature of memory pieces has made it possible
for the brain cells to first store memories, assemble them into
thoughts and make decisions. Once decisions are made; as shown
in the above, an organism possesses that natural ability, which
surely increases with training, to selectively activate different
parts of the central sensory and motor neural networks to bring
about the desired, premeditated movements, such as a tiger striking
a water buffalo after careful planning. It thinks, decides, and
then carries out selective activation and deactivation of various
parts of its sensori-motor cortical areas to accomplish this kill.
Only organisms capable of such learning, selective activation
of their own central motor areas could ever achieve this kind
of wilful locomotion. Now, since all normal animals with few exceptions
exhibit organized wilful or purposeful movements, they all, not
just the humans, operate by the electromagnetic mechanisms of
memory intake, storage and therefore learning, and subsequent
willed control of movements described in the above.
23/11/97:
That the animals also, not just man, possess this unique neuronal
ability to self-modulate the time, duration, and selected sites
of their own activation, enhancement and suppression attests to
the biological reality that animals' and man's fascinating organized
wilful movements are not directed by gods or spirits but by the
brain or central ganglionic neurons themselves. Especially when
aggregated into large masses, these central sensory and motor
neurons can through memory acquisition( seeing, hearing, feeling,
touching, rehearsing, thinking. . ..), storage, retrieval and
recombination sense and use their own memory contents, which as
proven in the above can only be eMs(Fig 7), to achieve wilful
behaviour under their own, these neurons' own, direction. This
magical ability to self-modulate has been, as alluded to in the
above, ascertained to be an inborn miracle of nature. It is an actual realization of something
seemingly impossible. However impossible it may seem, obviously
it is occurring. Otherwise, no animals or humans could ever have
demonstrated any wilful behaviour. We would all have remained
as primitive in locomotion or thinking as the viruses and bacteria
or fungi, not even as sophisticated as the ants, bees, flies.
Anyone insisting that this miracle property is not one component
of animal and human brain or central ganglionic neurons' natural
constitution is letting one's own subjective skepticism or prejudice
blind oneself to reality and the truth, as blind as denying memory
being eMs or insisting that the apes were our great grandpas.#FNT1
There is an infinite number of
eMs in the universe and operating in the perceptual and memory
systems of the various organisms, and there is that sensing
ingredient in the "electrically active" central sensory
and motor neurons. When the two come together, the resulting interaction(Fig.7)
produces sensations and memories of those objects having successfully
input their own or representing eMs into these neurons. As these
processes continue, the organism through the plasticity of the
neurons gains the ability to recognize the familiar(i.e. things
perceived before), gather eMs into thoughts, and through learning(
which is also memory formation and reuse) the self's and others'
cumulative knowledge, turn thoughts into intellectual faculties
for the self to behave in a logical or civilized or intelligent
manner.16 Here, it has been shown eMs as input sensations,
stored memories, self-sensed thoughts(Fig. 7), and detected telepathy
emitted from others(Fig.1) total consistency (1) in what memory
has to be in all aspects of its input#FNT2 and function in a living brain, (2)
in the central sensorineurons' ability to sense eMs properly input
into them by any one of the unique methods: afferent nerve impulse
input, or telepathic input, or from other interconnected brain
sensorineurons or from within the sensing brain neurons themselves,
and (3) in the intensification of sensations and their memories
during the learning process to acquire and perfect voluntary activities
particularly those in the form of learned skills.#FNT3 When memory being eMs satisfies all
these essential functional requirements and account for all mental
activities, it has been proven to be a scientific truth,a fact,
no longer just a theory that memory is eMs of those representing
or directly arising from the objects of which the memory has been
formed or used. It can not be anything else! The living laboratories,
namely the brains functioning in the living, have spoken!
End of I:3, can go to Cheng
Rev I:4 I:4
Home
0. A.
Craig, The Globe & Mail, 17/5/1996, p A 15
1. KC Cheng, Cheng Review, I:2. p10, 1997.
2
K. C. Cheng, The Electromagnetism
of Memory, Mentation and Behaviour, vols 1R(inst/med/mem/m-1Rs) ( in
preparation) & 2.
3 KC Cheng, Cheng Review, I:4. p1, 1998.